PBL (1) Gamification- Point, Badge, leaderboard

PBL (1) Gamification- Point, Badge, leaderboard

Applying the core elements of games in non-gaming environments is what we call "gamification" (Deterding, Khaled, Nacke, & Dixon, 2011; Huotari & Hamari, 2012… Yes, I really do read!). Therefore, gamification is not a game, it's not computer-aided instruction, and it's not so-called situational simulation (like flight simulation). The focus of gamification is to extract the crucial elements that make games fun, apply them to different domains, to increase user engagement, stimulate investment, and even boost performance. (As this isn't an academic paper, I will forego further citations).

So, can corporate education and training programs really be combined with gamification? Many corporate training programs are not only professionally content-heavy, but the learners are professionals themselves. Can gamification really impact this group of corporate executives and increase their participation and investment? The answer, of course, is a resounding: Yes!

Without personal experience, you might find it hard to believe: a vice president of a publicly listed company, while being in the same group as the director and managers in the early stages of a course, exclaimed, "Let's do our best, and I hope to bring this building block home for my son to play with!" (Everyone felt the pressure instantly). It's also hard to believe that HR said their engineers always had a dull atmosphere in their classes but would fiercely compete and eagerly raise their hands for extra points. And during the breaks of each class, groups would gather around the scoreboards to discuss the latest standings. These behaviors from the participants were beyond what HR could have imagined, and they would often ask me, "Teacher, do you have some kind of magic? Why do our engineers become so engaged and participate so actively?"

It's not magic; I simply incorporated three core elements of gamification into the course: P.B.L.! 
I meticulously designed the gamification of the curriculum!

Following the explanation in the book "Practical Gamification" by Zhou Yuka (2017), the three core elements of gamification, P.B.L., refer to points, badges, and leaderboards. However, based on my practical experience, I decided to change badges into benefits. So, in the FuGe edition of gamification, P.B.L. stands for points, benefits, and leaderboards (Wang Yongfu, 2018... Please remember the citation XD). Now, let's delve into how to implement the three elements of gamified P.B.L. in the curriculum:

Points

The first fundamental aspect of gamification is the points-based scoring mechanism. Every answer, participation, and performance by the participants should be rewarded with points. For example, raising your hand to answer earns you +1000 points, being the first group to stand on the stage earns you +5000 points, being the top scorer in a practice session earns you +20000 points, and so on.

You might be wondering, does this really work? After all, we're not dealing with children here, right? Well, it's the same story as before—without firsthand experience, without witnessing the power of gamification. Let's take the example of earning +5000 points for being the first group to take the stage. As soon as I asked, "Which group will go up first?" before I even finished speaking, there was a swift response from the audience with many hands shooting up! (Even the HR team was amazed! Are these really our participants? How is this possible?) In the past, everyone used to hesitate and avoid taking the stage, but now it's a race to be the first.

There are various methods for scoring, ranging from the simplest option of having groups keep score themselves (which may sometimes result in inaccurate or miscalculated scores), having assistants handle the scoring (more efficient but busier), having groups take turns to calculate scores (where one person is responsible for calculating the entire class's score in each session, ensuring fairness and minimizing issues). Alternatively, physical scoring items like playing cards, fake money, or chips can be used (although smooth distribution and tracking the total count are challenges that need to be considered).

Of course, there are certain considerations when it comes to managing points. For example, every participation should be rewarded with points (encouraging engagement, regardless of whether the answer is correct or the performance is good). Only adding points and not deducting them (punishment doesn't contribute to better performance). The teacher should have fair standards for awarding points (the game should be fair to be enjoyable). Differential scoring should be implemented (more difficult questions or challenges should have higher scores). Moreover, teachers should broaden their perspective and ensure that everyone and every group has opportunities to earn points. These are key points to consider when implementing the scoring system.

Conclusion

At this point, you might be wondering, what are these points we're competing for in class? What can they be used for? Of course, points are not useless; they can be redeemed for benefits. This brings us to the second core of gamification: Benefits. We'll discuss this in our next article.

Note 1: The term "gamification" emerged in 2008 and gained widespread discussion after the introduction of the FourSquare check-in app in 2010. However, our application of these concepts in the curriculum predates this by a significant margin. It was referred to as "team motivation strategies" back then, not gamification.

Note 2: Do you like this article?  Let me know your opinion!

Read more

王永福老师《游戏化教学的技术 国际版》正式登陆Amazon Kindle

王永福老师《游戏化教学的技术 国际版》正式登陆Amazon Kindle

《游戏化教学的技术 国际版》(Gamification in Training and Teaching) 现已在Amazon Kindle上架 立即在Amazon Kindle购买 → https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GC8QXPPG 为什么需要重新理解"游戏化"? 在多数教学和培训场域中,我们常观察到这样的现象: 提出问题后,教室里一片沉默。学员注意力分散,参与度明显下降。为了改善这个状况,许多教育工作者开始尝试"游戏化"——但实际效果往往不如预期。 出席就给分?参与就发徽章?排行榜反而制造焦虑? 这也是为什么这本书要重新定义"游戏化"的原因。真正的游戏化不是把游戏机制硬套在内容上,而是一套有科学根据的设计系统。参与感不是靠运气或个人魅力,而是可以被设计、被衡量、被重复的。 这本书试图解决什么问题? 《游戏化教学的技术 国际版》

By Jeff Wang
简报与演讲技巧——强化观众记忆点的3个方法

简报与演讲技巧——强化观众记忆点的3个方法

不知道大家有没有类似的经验:参加完一场精彩的简报或演讲,虽然内容丰富,演讲者也表现得非常出色。可是如果要您回想一下刚才简报时听到了什么……除了精彩、有趣这些形容词外……您好像也想不起简报具体的内容…… 会有这些问题,是因为演讲者往往忘了在简报规划时,思考一下如何强化观众的记忆点。有时整个演讲或简报过程太顺畅、太精彩,反而更容易出现这个问题,台下观众完全跟着演讲的结构往下走,却不容易记起真正重要的地方。因此,为了让听众记得更多、记得更清楚,您也许可以参考以下几个强化记忆点的策略。 1. 三的原则 不论您的演讲中有多少重点,请应用三的原则,把它浓缩成三个重点!没错!就是三个重点,不是四个……也不是两个,而是三个重点。这是从人类有效记忆的观点出发,人们很容易记住3这个分割,3个重点是人们最容易记住的数量。整场演讲中,如果您希望观众只记得三个重点,那会是哪三个?在上台之前,您自己就应该把这三个重点抓出来,这样您才知道待会要如何强调它们。 比如说王永福先前在简报技巧演讲时,把演讲内容切成「投影片、实务、准备」三个重点。或是另一场谈到简报修炼的三阶段「见山是山/不是山/又是山」,每阶段又

By Jeff Wang